0

CONCERNS REGARDING THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS IN COMPLIANCE WITH BNSS, THE SOP FOR AUDIO-VIDEO RECORDING AT CRIME SCENES.

Under the new criminal procedure legislation, known as Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), the Ministry of Home Affairs has released a Standard of Procedure for the audio and video recording of crime scenes as suggested guidelines.

To meet their immediate need for a handholding document, field practitioners participated in extensive brainstorming sessions that resulted in the preparation of the SOP. In order to guarantee the admission of crime scene photos and videos in a court of law, it serves as a guideline for the functional and operational aspects of the field.

The technical elements, such as the contents, analysis, and photos obtained by forensic specialists, are only superficial and not thoroughly covered.

It has now been made clear that the SOP is a set of recommended guidelines that are shared for use by law enforcement and police units in states and central organizations. However, the states and central police organizations are free to expand upon this basic structure in accordance with their unique requirements and the need for special acts that are dependent on these procedural laws.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SOP:

The two parts of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) are the Standing Operating Procedure for Videography in Investigative Compliance & Seizure of Electronic and Digital Devices Found as Part of Investigation and General Police Procedures for Videography.

  1. For the public to have faith in the police to accurately and truthfully document and preserve crime scenes, they need to be equipped with basic technology and the right training.

  1. By abiding by the general guidelines provided, state units and central police organizations will improve the environment of evidence gathering through audio-video recording.

  1. The investigating officer should follow a systematic procedure while entering the crime scene to ensure that no important evidence is overlooked.

  1. Independent witnesses, who could or might not be government representatives, will be present during the search. When conducting a search, police officers may also be mentioned as witnesses if no witnesses are present. The witnesses who are also known as Panch Witnesses are required to sign the seizure memo.

  1. Because they are admissible evidence, seizure memoranda pertaining to objects that were collected at the accused’s request should be properly drafted.

  1. For official criminal investigation purposes, only digital cameras and audio video recorders that have been approved and provided by the department may be utilized.

  1. There must be no breaks during the whole filming of the show. Additionally, it is mandatory for all members of the first responder or forensic teams to remain silent and refrain from talking during the videography process to prevent the defense from using it to undermine the integrity of the investigation. The same is anticipated of the in attendance witnesses.

  1. The officer in charge of the police station must provide the following: video recordings of crime scenes, records of searches and seizures, information relevant to cases that qualify for a formal complaint (FIR), and orders on the custody and disposal of property.

  1. Both the handler (or manager) and an expert must certify each audio-video recording made as part of procedural compliance, investigative compliance, and the seizure of pertinent digital evidence.

  1. As required by the New Criminal Laws, the states must provide for the additional needs of police stations regarding audio-video recording. These needs include a dedicated desktop for the Evidence Specialist, Data Manager, Information Assistant, and First Responders; a vehicle specifically designed to transport digital forensic experts and first responders to the crime scene; a room specifically designated for forensic teams and first responders; and storage facilities at data centers for parallel storage.

  1. Many central and state units have previously built an Android, iOS, or MS-based program that is backed by a web application. However, with the introduction of the New Criminal Laws, NCRB is now introducing a cloud-based audio/video recording application through “e-Sakshya” that will be integrated with CCTNS-2.0.

  1. The eSakshya Platform integration will be mandatory for states.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal falls into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

WRITTEN BY: ABHISHEK SINGH

11

Bombay High Court directed the State of Maharashtra to formulate SOP in order to avoid the need for Court’s approval in MTP exceeding 24 Weeks

Case title: ABC Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Case no.: Writ Petition No. 2319 of 2024

Decision on: April 5th, 2024

Quoram: Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Nitin W Sambre

Facts of the case

The petitioner had filed a writ under Article 226 and sought the Court to direct the respondents to allow her to undergo medical termination of pregnancy on the ground of carrying abnormal foetus. Considering the fact that her pregnancy had exceeded twenty four weeks, the Court directed the Civil Surgeon to conduct a medical examination and submit a report.

The Medical Board at the General Hospital, Wardha, comprising nine doctors and one matron, conducted the examination and submitted its report, confirming the abnormalities in the foetus. The Report of the Medical Board revealed that continuation of pregnancy of petitioner who is thirty two weeks pregnant would result in grave injury to her mental health and also involve substantial risks as to physical abnormalities of her child, if born. The Medical Board thus recommended for the termination of pregnancy.

Issue – Medical Termination of Pregnancy exceeding 24 weeks in case of carrying abnormal foetus.

Court’s Analysis and Judgement

The Court delved into Section 3(2) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 and noted that a pregnancy with a length of twenty weeks may be terminated by a registered medical practitioner and where the length of pregnancy is between twenty and twenty four weeks by two registered practitioners. Further, it also highlighted the exception carved out under sub-section 2B of Section 3, which permitted the termination of pregnancy exceeding twenty-four weeks if the diagnosis by Medical Board suggests that continuance of the same would lead to substantial foetal abnormalities. In view of the above statutory provisions, the Court directed the Management of the Hospital to terminate the pregnancy of the petitioner.

However in the course of passing the order, it also observed averments on the Doctors of General Hospital, Wardha. The Court noted that despite the provision of the MTP Act and the MTP Rules, 2003, which laid down mandate as to the termination of pregnancy exceeding 24 weeks, the doctors ignored the referral to a Medical Board in such cases and forced the petitioner to seek the permission of the court to terminate her pregnancy.

In light of the above analysis, the Court directed the Department of Public Health and the Department of Medical Education and Drugs of the State of Maharashtra to formulate Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and issue the same to all government hospitals and medical colleges in the State of Maharashtra in order to avoid the need for Court’s approval in such matters. It also took into account the petitioner’s financial constraints and directed the Management of General Hospital, Wardha to bear all the expenses related to hospitalization, procedures, and medicines. Thereby, posted the matter on June 12th, 2024.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Judgement Reviewed by – Keerthi K

Click here to view the Judgement