0

Exit Poll Regulations and Challenges in India’s 2024 Lok Sabha Elections: Legal Framework Delineate  

Articles, News & Media links , , , , , ,

Exit Poll Regulations and Challenges in India’s 2024 Lok Sabha Elections: Legal Framework Delineate

Introduction

The Lok Sabha elections in India, often characterized as the world’s largest democratic exercise, garner significant attention both domestically and internationally. The 2024 elections, like their predecessors, are expected to be a highly contentious and closely monitored affair. One of the critical aspects of this electoral process is the role of exit polls. Exit polls, surveys conducted immediately after voters leave polling stations, aim to predict the outcome of the elections before the official results are announced. This article delves into the legal framework governing exit polls in India, the controversies they generate, their impact on public perception, and the regulatory challenges they pose. Exit polls are surveys conducted with voters as they leave a polling station during an election. The purpose is to gather information on how people voted and their demographic characteristics. These polls provide early indications of election results before official results are announced. An exit poll was conducted by the Indian Institute of Public Opinion during the second Lok Sabha elections in 1957. Sampling Methods: The reliability of the sampling methods used in conducting exit polls is crucial. A well-designed and representative sample is more likely to produce accurate results. Some common parameters for a good, or accurate, opinion poll would be a sample size that is both large and diverse, and a clearly constructed questionnaire without an overt bias. Structured Questionnaire Surveys, like exit polls, collect data by interviewing many respondents using a structured questionnaire, either over the phone or in person. According to the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, “Without a structured questionnaire, the data can neither be collected coherently nor be analyzed systematically to arrive at vote share estimates. Demographic Representation Ensuring that the surveyed population is demographically representative of the overall voting population is essential. If certain groups are over or underrepresented, it can impact the accuracy of the predictions. A large sample size is important but what matters most is how well the sample represents the larger population, rather than the size of the sample. Exit polls can be controversial if the agency conducting them is perceived to be biased. These surveys can be influenced by the choice, wording and timing of the questions, and by the nature of the sample drawn. Critics argued that many opinion and exit polls are motivated and sponsored by their rivals, and could have a distorting effect on the choices voters make in a protracted election, rather than simply reflecting public sentiment or views.

Legal Framework Governing Exit Polls

The conduct and publication of exit polls in India are regulated by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and guidelines issued by the Election Commission of India (ECI). According to Section 126A of the Act, conducting exit polls and publishing their results is prohibited from the start of polling in the first phase until the conclusion of polling in the last phase of the elections. The law was enacted to ensure that exit poll results do not influence voters in regions where polling is yet to be completed. The ECI’s Model Code of Conduct (MCC) further reinforces these restrictions by outlining the dos and don’ts for political parties and media outlets. The MCC, a set of guidelines designed to ensure free and fair elections, becomes operative from the date the election schedule is announced until the end of the election process. Any violation of these norms, including premature publication of exit poll results, can lead to punitive actions against the offending media house or entity. The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) regarding the 2024 Lok Sabha exit polls addresses concerns about the potential impact and regulation of exit polls during the election period. The case revolves around the adherence to Section 126A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which prohibits the conduct and dissemination of exit poll results until all phases of voting are completed. According to the Election Commission of India (ECI), exit polls cannot be published or publicized during the voting period to avoid influencing voters in ongoing or future phases of the election. This restriction is in place from 7:00 AM on the first day of polling (April 19, 2024) until 6:30 PM on the last day of polling (June 1, 2024)​. Violating these regulations can result in penalties, including imprisonment or fines. The PIL contends that exit polls might impact voter behavior and seeks stricter enforcement of the existing regulations. The ECI’s guidelines mandate that media outlets must notify the commission before conducting exit polls and must follow a code of conduct to ensure fair and unbiased reporting​. The case highlights the broader implications of exit polls in shaping public sentiment and potentially affecting the stock market due to perceived election outcomes​. The Supreme Court’s decision on this matter could reinforce or modify the regulatory framework governing exit polls in India.

Section 126A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 prohibits conduct of Exit poll and dissemination of their results by means of print or electronic media during the period mentioned therein, i.e. between the hour fixed for commencement of poll in the first phase and half an hour after the time fixed for close of poll for the last phase in all the States. The Election Commission is responsible for regulating the use of exit polls. According to the ECI, exit polls can only be conducted during a specific period. This period starts from the time when the polling booths close and ends 30 minutes after the last booth has closed. Exit polls cannot be conducted during the voting period or on polling day. The Election Commission issued guidelines under Article 324 of the Constitution, prohibiting newspapers and news channels from publishing results of pre-election surveys and exit polls. The EC also mandated that while carrying the results of exit and opinion polls, newspapers and channels should disclose the sample size of the electorate, the details of polling methodology, the margin of error and the background of the polling agency. The ban on the publication of exit polls remains in place until the last phase of voting is completed. In addition to the ban on the publication of exit polls, the ECI also requires that all media outlets that conduct exit polls must register with the commission. Section 66A of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (as amended) makes it a criminal offence ‘to publish, before a poll is closed, any statement about the way in which voters have voted in that election, where this statement is, or might reasonably be taken to be, based on information given by voters after they voted’. It is also an offence under the Act ‘to publish, before a poll is closed, any forecast – including any estimate – of that election result, if the forecast is based on exit poll information from voters, or which might reasonably be taken to be based on it’. These laws apply to both parliamentary and local elections, elections to the Welsh Assembly and by-elections. The Act applies to exit polls focusing on voting in a particular constituency or ward and to voting patterns nationally. The publication of exit polls is also prohibited during voting for European Parliamentary elections.

Controversies Surrounding Exit Polls

Despite the legal restrictions, exit polls remain a subject of significant controversy in Indian elections. Critics argue that these polls can potentially influence voter behaviour and disrupt the level playing field essential for democratic elections. For instance, if exit polls indicate a clear trend towards a particular party, it might discourage supporters of the opposing party from voting, thereby affecting voter turnout and the final election results. Moreover, the accuracy of exit polls is often questioned. Past elections have seen numerous instances where exit polls have significantly deviated from the actual results, leading to debates about their methodological rigor and reliability. The 2019 Lok Sabha elections, for example, witnessed a wide range of predictions, some of which were drastically off the mark compared to the final outcomes.

Impact on Public Perception

Exit polls, while not legally binding, play a crucial role in shaping public perception and media narratives. In the age of 24/7 news cycles and social media proliferation, the results of exit polls can spread rapidly, influencing public discourse. Political parties often use favourable exit poll results to bolster their image and morale, while unfavourable ones are dismissed as flawed or biased. The psychological impact of exit polls on voters cannot be understated. The bandwagon effect, where voters support the perceived winner, and the underdog effect, where voters support the perceived loser, are phenomena that can be triggered by exit poll results. Thus, exit polls can indirectly affect voter behaviour and, consequently, the democratic process.

Regulatory Challenges

Regulating exit polls poses significant challenges. The primary challenge lies in balancing the right to freedom of speech and expression, guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, with the need to maintain the integrity of the electoral process. The ban on exit polls during the polling period is a restrictive measure that aims to prevent undue influence on voters, but it also raises questions about censorship and media freedom. Another challenge is the enforcement of these regulations in the digital age. With the advent of social media platforms and instant messaging services, information, including exit poll results, can be disseminated rapidly and widely, often bypassing traditional regulatory mechanisms. Ensuring compliance with exit poll regulations in this environment requires innovative strategies and cooperation from tech companies.

Comparative Perspectives

Looking at other democracies, the approach to regulating exit polls varies. In the United States, there is no federal law prohibiting exit polls, though media organizations often adhere to self-imposed embargoes on releasing results until polling stations close. In the United Kingdom, exit polls are allowed but with strict regulations on their release to avoid influencing voters. Comparative analysis shows that while some countries Favor more stringent regulations to prevent voter influence, others rely on media self-regulation and public trust. The effectiveness of these approaches often depends on the maturity of the democratic institutions and the media landscape in each country. Future Directions as India prepares for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the debate over exit polls is likely to intensify. There are several potential directions for future regulatory frameworks Enhanced Self-Regulation by Media: Encouraging media organizations to adopt stricter self-regulation norms, including voluntary embargoes on exit poll results until all phases of voting are complete. Stronger Enforcement Mechanisms Developing more robust mechanisms to monitor and enforce compliance with exit poll regulations, especially on digital platforms. Public Awareness Campaigns: Conducting campaigns to educate voters about the potential inaccuracies of exit polls and their limitations in predicting actual election outcomes. Technological Solutions: Leveraging technology to track and control the dissemination of exit poll results, possibly through collaborations with social media platforms and tech companies. Review and Revision of Laws: Periodically reviewing and revising the legal framework governing exit polls to address emerging challenges and ensure it remains relevant and effective.

Conclusion

The regulation of exit polls in the context of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections represents a complex interplay between legal mandates, media practices, and democratic principles. While exit polls provide valuable insights and contribute to the vibrancy of democratic discourse, their potential to influence voter behaviour necessitates careful regulation. Striking a balance between freedom of expression and the need to ensure free and fair elections will continue to be a critical challenge for policymakers, media organizations, and the Election Commission of India. As the electoral landscape evolves, so too must the strategies to manage the impact of exit polls, ensuring that the democratic process remains robust and untainted. This survey of the regulatory approaches adopted by various democratic governments to the publication of pre-election opinion and exit polls reveals no set pattern from which general rules can be derived. It is significant that from among the established democracies surveyed, only Italy imposes a ban of more than 24 hours and that there is a clear trend towards shorter bans. Courts in these countries have questioned the assumption implication in bans that voters are uninformed and naïve, as well as the implications of bans of this nature – which prevent the media from disseminating true, factual material – for freedom of expression. These courts have also noted that in the modern world, where access to the Internet and satellite television is becoming ever more commonplace, bans of this sort may no longer be viable. Whether a country’s law satisfies the three-part test for restrictions on freedom of expression does depend to some extent on the particular circumstances of that country. An important factor, in addition to the degree of Internet and satellite television access, is the degree of independence possessed by the national media and the willingness of these media to accept voluntary restrictions on reporting on polls. Were important parts of the national media, including the public media, are controlled by political figures, any risk of bias from opinions polls increases. 

Written by:HariRaghava JP

0

Pressure Groups and Their Role in Indian polity

Uncategorized , , , ,

Pressure Groups and Their Role in Indian polity

ABSTRACT
Pressure groups seek favourable policy decisions and administrative dispositions. This is influenced not by the formal constitutional structure of governments as to the distribution of effective power within a governmental apparatus. Influential organisation or associations that seek to promote specific interest and exert pressure on the government or their goals are called Pressure groups. The Pressure group serves as a point of contact for the government’s citizens, it enables individuals to associate with one another and voice their interest and grievances which are essential rights in any democracy. Pressure groups are organised groups of people who seek to promote their specific interest and exert pressure on the government or the decision makers for the fulfilment of their interest.
Pressure groups are non-aligned groups and work as indirect but powerful groups to influence the decisions of the system. Pressure groups have limited and narrow focused areas and issues, a pressure group is a public body acting outside the domain of political parties constitute government and perform within the system. Pressure groups pressurise the executive and legislative to achieve their aims, whereas political parties attempt to bring coordination in the working of the executive and legislative bodies. It use both conventional and non-conventional methods to demonstrate their demands, whereas political parties only use constitutional means to execute their duties and functions.
KEYWORDS – Pressure groups, Administrative System, political parties, legislation, public policy, Civil society, Narrow domain, External to the Government, Protection of interest, Policy Implementation, Policy Formulations, Political Participation, Public Opinion, Electioneering, Lobbying, Propagandizing, Advocate Democracy, Encourage Legislators, Political Awareness, Promote political education, political organisations, Functional Representation.

INTRODUCTION
Pressure groups play a significant role in Indian polity, representing various interests and exerting influence on government policies and decisions. The history of pressure groups in India dates back to pre-independence times when organizations like the Indian National Congress and All India Muslim League mobilized masses for political goals. Post-independence, pressure groups diversified to include industry associations, trade unions, environmental groups, and more, each advocating for their respective agendas. These groups often use tactics like lobbying, protests, and advocacy to influence government actions, making them crucial actors in the Indian political landscape1. The members of such organized groups are united regarding some specific interests they tend to advance. For example, the workers of a factory are organized in what is called a trade union to promote their interests. A pressure group is an organized group of people that aims to influence public opinion or policies/actions of government. It includes churches and charities, businesses and trade associations, trade unions and professional associations, think tanks of various complexions etc. Purpose of a Pressure Group Although
_________________
1.https://egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream

some pressure groups were set up for the specific purpose of influencing government, many pressure groups exist for other purposes and only engage in politics as a secondary or associated activity.
As pressure groups exert influence on government from outside, they do not therefore put candidates up for election. In that sense, they are part of civil society. These groups use various methods to achieve their aims including lobbying, research campaigns, media campaigns, policy briefs and polls. Pressure groups can therefore act as a channel of communication between the people and government. They influence policy-making and policy implementation in the government through legal or legitimate methods like lobbying, correspondence, publicity, propagandizing, petitioning, public debating, maintaining contacts with their legislators, etc.

FUNCTIONS, ROLE & IMPORTANCE OF PRESSURE GROUPS
Pluralists argue that pressure group politics is a very important stuff for democracy because these groups play different kind of roles and functions which helped in advancing the idea of pluralist democracy. In this regard, a pluralist, Robert Dahl believes that democracy is based on the notion of one person one vote with the emphasis on the role of the individual, is that in modern society there are so many individuals, each of them has carried one will which also would no weight as such. Therefore, in this situation, the only way that the individual can successfully articulate interests is in conjunction with others. The following role & functions of pressure groups as follows:
Interest Articulation: Pressure Groups bring the demands and needs of the people to the notice of the decision-makers. The process by which the claims of the people get crystallized and articulated is called interest articulation.
Pressure Groups and Administration: Pressure Groups are actively involved with the process of administration. Through lobbying with the bureaucracy, the pressure groups are usually in a position to influence the process of policy implementation.
Role in Judicial Administration: Pressure Groups try to use the judicial system for securing and safeguarding their interests. Interest groups often seek access to the court for redressal of their grievances against the government as well as for getting declared a particular decision or policy as unconstitutional.
They try to gain public support and sympathy for their goals and their activity by carrying out information campaigns, organising meetings, file petitions, etc. Most of these groups try to influence the media into giving attention to these issues. Pressure groups help to educate people, compile data and provide specific information to policy makers, thus they work as an informal source of information. Active constructive participation of numerous groups in polity helps to reconcile general interest with individual group interests2.
Representation:
Pressure groups provide a mouthpiece for groups and interests that are not adequately represented through the electoral process or by political parties. This occurs, in part, because groups are concerned with the specific rather than the general groups articulate the views or interests of particular groups and focus on specific causes. It has even been argued that pressure groups provide an alternative to the formal representative process through what has been called functional representation.
2. https://www.nios.ac.in/media/documents/SecSocSciCour/English/Lesson-21.pdf
CLASSIFICATION OF PRESSURE GROUPS
In India, in a pluralistic society within the democratic framework number of pressure groups are performing in different sectors. They can be classified into five categories:
Professional pressure groups (FICCI, CII, Trade unions, Farmers unions, student unions, etc.) Socio-cultural pressure groups (RSS, VHP, Jamat-e-Islami, Harijan Sevak Sangh, Tamil Sangh, etc.) Institutional pressure groups (Police welfare association, War widow association, etc.) Anomic pressure groups (Naxals, etc.) Ad hoc pressure groups (formed during disasters in various parts of the country, etc.) Apart from these, some ideology-based pressure groups are performing in India, like Narmada Bachao Andolan, Chipko Movement, Women’s Rights Organisation, etc. These all pressure groups, like in other countries, are expected to function as a bridge and source of communication between the mass and political systems. They are expected to sensitise people toward various social and economic issues
RECENT ISSUES WITH PRESSURE GROUPS IN INDIA DEMOCRACY
Politicisation and crony capitalism due to political funding Resorting to unconstitutional means and violence on different occasions Non – organised structure and lack of governance Unaccounted foreign funding has destabilizing effect on economy Vote bank politics Lack of accountability and transparency Narrow perspective and lobbying which leads to increase in inequality Propagating extremism. Pressure groups in India, by and large, have no political commitment. They are weak and do not openly extend their support to the political party other than the one which is in power. They hesitate to displease authorities and the government. It is hoped that these groups will always be non-violent and follow secular policies. These groups try to strengthen only such parties, which they feel are likely to come to power, if already not in authority. For them their own interests are supreme and paramount and when they feel that these clash with those of the others, in order to preserve their interests, they go to the other extreme end. Pressure groups in India have not been very successful because of several reasons. The main reason for this is that they have failed to organise themselves as a second body. They have no well-developed infrastructure which can help in regularly and vigorously pursuing their interests. Single party dominant system at the centre is also considerably responsible for their slow growth. Political parties do not wish that any serious challenge be thrown to their authority even by powerful pressure groups. Not only this, but even pressure groups have tried to develop under the patronage of political parties. The funds are provided to them in a bid to go near them and directions are received from political bosses. Even political parties try to divide each pressure group and to have a strong hold over one such group at least.
Then by and large they follow negative methods for getting their work done. As is well known such a method is negative rather than being the positive one. Then another cause of their slow growth is that in India individual legislators have not been found very effective by the pressure groups. Each such group realises that because of party discipline and with the operation of the Anti-Defection Act, each legislator must vote on party lines3. Thus, contacts should be developed with the party and not with any individual legislator. The pressure groups also realise that in India bureaucracy is very strong and can help them a lot. But somehow so far these groups, by and large, have failed to corrupt bureaucracy. There is also no unity in pressure groups. In fact, there is no group which is not a house bitterly divided into several factions and sub-groups, one speaking openly against the other. In several cases there is also a lack of good leaders. In several cases pressure group leaders try to become political leaders. Their political ambitions frustrate the basic character of the pressure group. Most of the pressure groups like trade unions, student organisations, etc., are not financially very sound and without finances these cannot function effectively.
3. https://www.drishtiias.com/pdf/1605592142-pressure-group.pdf

It is common knowledge that Indian democracy is undergoing a fundamental transformation. This has been marked by several changes including systemic ones in the nature of electoral competition, a multi-fold increase in the size of the middle class, penetration of social media, and the withering away of old hierarchies, amongst others. The social and geographical expansion of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) since 2014, has altered the political landscape resulting in further marginalisation of the Congress, the decimation of the Left Front, and the decline in the strength of state-level parties. The BJP has made significant gains across the board, which has lessened the differences between various voting blocs curated in the past along with other social cleavages. Similarly, state-level specificities that dominated the discourse in the previous two decades, now have somewhat diminished status in electoral analyses, especially to understand the contours of national politics4.

ROLE OF JUDICIARY
In a democracy, the Constitution reigns supreme, with the Judiciary serving as its guardian. Democracy allows people to participate in decision-making through elected representatives or direct involvement. The separation of powers divides governance into three branches: the Legislature makes laws, representing public interests; the Executive enforces laws, led by a President or Prime Minister; and the Judiciary interprets and applies laws, ensuring constitutional compliance and safeguarding rights. This separation prevents the concentration of power. In parliamentary systems like India, the Executive and Legislature are interdependent. The Judiciary acts as a vital check, upholding the Rule of Law and protecting against power abuses, ensuring a balanced democratic system The Judiciary has the power to review any law or executive action that it considers violating the provisions of the Constitution. This power is exercised through the process of judicial review, which is the power of the Judiciary to declare a law or executive action unconstitutional. This power of judicial review has been instrumental in shaping the Constitution of India and ensuring that the provisions of the Constitution are implemented effectively. Judicial review is adopted by the Constitution of India from the Constitution of the USA. In India, judicial review is broad in scope and deals with a variety of issues. Electoral Bonds were a mode of funding for political parties in India from their introduction in 2017 till they were struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court on 15 February 2024.The Supreme Court has the power of Judicial Review in various ways, including when there is a conflict between the Centre and States, or when there is a violation of the jurisdiction exercised by the Legislature and Executive. Most importantly, the Supreme Court is the guardian of Fundamental Rights. It protects the fundamental rights of Indian citizens, through issuing various writs provided under Article 32. Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India empowers citizens to address issues affecting the public at large, not just individually. The judiciary has actively used PILs to champion environmental protection, sustainable development, and wildlife preservation. It has been instrumental in upholding individual liberties, including the right to privacy, freedom of speech, and combating discrimination. Landmark judgments have also advanced education, women’s rights, and decriminalized homosexuality, leading to significant social change.

————————————-
4.https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/columns/big-picture-understanding-interest-groups-political-line/article66581470.ece

 

CONCLUSION
Pressure groups are now considered as a helpful and indispensable element of the democratic process. The society has become highly complex and individuals cannot pursue their interests on their own. They need the support of other fellow beings in order to gain greater bargaining power. This gives rise to pressure groups based on common interests. For a long time, these groups remained unnoticed. Initially they were considered as harmful for the democratic process, but now their role in the political process has become very important. Democratic politics has to be politics through consultation and negotiation and some amount of bargaining is also involved as well. Thus, it is very essential for the government to consult these organised groups at the time of policy formulation and implementation. Pressure groups play a vital role in shaping Indian democracy by advocating for diverse interests and holding institutions accountable. Moving forward, fostering transparency, promoting constructive dialogue, and ensuring inclusive representation can enhance the effectiveness and legitimacy of pressure groups activities in India5.

 

 

 

 

—————————————–5.http://insightsonindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/pressure-groups.pdf

Written by Hariraghava jp