0

Bombay HC acquits a person due to the lack of incriminating evidence in a homicide trial : Motive, Last seen together and DNA evidence not sufficient.

TITLE : Ganesh Bhatu Shinde V The state of Maharashtra

CITATION : Criminal Appeal 549 of 2018

CORAM : Hon’ble justice Smt.Vibha Kankanwadi and Hon’ble Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

DATE:  7th December, 2023

INTRODUCTION :

There being charge of Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC, it is necessary to be seen whether in the trial Court prosecution has established death of Deceased to be nothing but homicidal.

FACTS :

The appellant was alleged of a murder as he had an dispute with the deceased. It is the story of the prosecution that, appellant had approached deceased on 14-08-2015 for compromising the matter and accordingly, deceased was taken to the Court but there deceased put up conditions which angered appellant and thereby he was taken, assaulted and his body was finally disposed of at a remote place which was finally spotted by Police Patil and then Police came in picture.

One of the witnesses claimed that the death was of due to vehicular accident. However the autopsy doctor held that there was no injury to sustain the argument of vehicular accident and the death is of homicidal nature.

COURT’S ANALYSIS

The court held that since there was animosity and further, deceased putting up conditions for withdrawal had also allegedly angered appellant is sufficient motive along with the fact that the deceased allegedly abused the appellant in filthy language. Secondly, the appellant was the last person the deceased was seen with alive. However the court relied upon the witnesses and held that The proximity of time since last seen together and deceased found dead being considerably huge, it is improper to connect appellant with the death. As of the DNA marks of the appellant on the deceased, it was held that there was no sufficient incriminating evidence to prove the same as the quantity of DNA found was very less.

The appellant was acquitted and the charges against him under Section 102 IPC was quashed.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by- Sanjana Ravichandran

click here to view judgement

0

If the dying declaration is truthful, voluntary and free from suspicion, it CAN be the basis for conviction: Bombay High Court

Title: Bhagwan Ramdas Tupe v. The State of Maharashtra

Decided on: 28th JULY, 2023

+ CRL.A. 530 OF 2016

CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

Facts of the Case

Bhagwan Ramdas Tupe (BRT) was previously convicted for Murder of one Vithabai, his neighbour and was thereof sentenced to life imprisonment.  BRT appealed to the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay HC and sought acquittal on the basis that there were inconsistencies between the dying declarations of 2 witnesses.

The respondents sought for the dismissal of the appeal for there was no “inconsistency” at all.  According to them the minor details may have been inconsistent, but overall, the story in both the dying declarations and Prime Witnesses is the same.

It was alleged that BRT had poured kerosene and tembha, i.e., burning wood, on Vithabai, due to which she sustained major burn injuries. She had not died instantly, she succumbed to the injuries only 2 months after the incident and before her death she gave her dying declaration to the Inspector.

Issues

Should the Dying Declaration of Vithabai be considered the basis for conviction?

Decision

The Court decided on the dying declaration made by Vithabai that although she had injuries, she was mentally sound and able to speak. In fact, her dying declaration corroborated with the Prime Witnesses’ story and therefore, the dying declaration made by her was truthful, voluntary and free from any suspicion.

Thus, the Court upheld the conviction and dismissed the appeal.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by – Aparna Gupta, University Law College & Dept. of Studies in Law