0

Quashing of FIR: Seeking Justice when Merit is Lacking, Cutting Through Frivolity- M.P. High Court

Title: Pankaj Mehta, Nutan Mehta, Robin Mehta vs SMT. Purvi Kimtee & ORS.

Citation: MISC. CRIMINAL CASE NO. 33634 OF 2023

Decided on: 17.10.23

Introduction:

In this case the applicants have filed a petition under Section 482 to seek the quashment of the FIR registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Indore. The applicants are likely seeking the quashment of the FIR on the grounds that it might be frivolous or lacking in merit. The High Court will assess the merits of the case and consider whether it is a fit instance for invoking its inherent powers under Section 482 of Crpc to quash criminal proceedings.

FACTS:

The facts of the case are such that the respondent No. 2, Smt. Purvi Kimtee, and Robin Kimtee were married on My 12, 2018, in accordance with Hindu customs. The complaint claims that the Complainant’s father gave her a dowry of Rs. 5lakhs, priceless ornaments and wedding expenditure totaling Rs. 40 lakhs. The complainant was harassed by her spouse and his family for small matters shortly after they were married. The complainant stated that she wanted her spouse to pay for her Australian residency permit and it is purporated that her spouse collected money from her parents to fulfill this request.

The plaintiff were compelled to return to India as they did not have a residential visa of Australia. She didn’t stop pushing her spouse to file for her Australian residence visa. Her parents sent her husband Rs. 10 lakhs so they could go to Australia but she ran into visa problems and had to go back to India. Her parents next attempted to obtain her residential visa by paying her husband’s family Rs. 25 lakhs but this also proved fruitless. Respondent No.2 responded to the circumstances by filing a FIR with Crime No. 124/2021 against the applicants. After the end of the investigation a charge sheet was later submitted to the Trial Court against the accused applicant for the investigation.

COURT ANALYSIS AND JUDGEMENT:

The court concludes that, in view of the aforementioned legal concept, the purpose and object of law is not only to punish the criminals but also to promote peace, calm and harmony in the respective community. If the husband and wife reach a compromise through the attempts made by their family members, it will benefit society as a whole as well.

Court also concluded that it goes without saying that this kind of agreement should be promoted in order to keep the marriage intact and give the partners time to reflect on their mistakes and work out their differences cooperatively with mutual consent as opposed to battling in a court of law where it takes time to finish case. The complainant and her husband’s family members have resolved their disagreements and have made the decision to live apart, making them extremely technological opinions about the compromise may be detrimental and counterproductive.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written By – Gauri Joshi

Click here to view judgement

0

The Paddy Land Act prohibits digging wells on paddy land for commercial purposes. The Kerala High Court.

Title: Hema Anil v State of Kerala.

Decided on: 18th, October 2023

Writ C No. – 23660 Of 2023

CORAM: The Honorable Mr. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas.

INTRODUCTION

The Kerala High Court is considering a case concerning the commercial use of paddy land, specifically the drilling of wells for a packaged drinking water manufacturing facility. Hema Anil, the petitioner, requested authorization to drill a well for this business venture. The Panchayat and the Ground Water Department, however, expressed worries regarding the legality and ecological effects of such actions. This case emphasizes the value of protecting wetlands and paddy fields in Kerala, India, as well as the interpretation of pertinent laws and regulations.

FACTS OF THE CASE

Hema Anil requested permission to drill a well on paddy land in this case before the Kerala High Court in order to pursue a business venture that would involve the production of packaged drinking water. The property’s suitability for well construction was verified by the Ground Water Department. Nonetheless, the Panchayat and the authorities brought up legal and ecological issues. The main question in the case is whether drilling wells on paddy land for profit complies with Kerala’s applicable laws and regulations. In the end, the court denied the writ petition, highlighting the need to protect wetlands and paddy fields for their ecological value.

COURTS ANALYSIS AND DECISION

The Kerala High Court emphasized the ecological significance of protecting these areas by outlawing well-digging on paddy land for profit. It rejected the petition, highlighting the fact that commercial operations on such lands run counter to the goals of the law.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer. “

Written by- Kusuma R

Kerala Hc

 

0

State authorities are completely unaware of the distinction between “law and order” and “public order.” – Gujarat High court

TITLE: Girjashankar V State of Gujarat

Decided On-: 02/08/2023

11079 of 2023

CORAM: Hon’ble Justice Mr. A.S Supehia and M.R Mengdey

INTRODUCTION- The purpose of the current petition is to contest the detention order made by the respondent, who is the detaining authority, in accordance with the authority granted by section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 According to Act section 2(c), the petitioner-detenu was held in custody.

FACTS OF THE CASE

 The impugned order of detention of the detenu needed to be quashed and overturned because the detaining authority had made the decision to detain the detenu solely on the basis of the registration of two FIRs, which is insufficient to bring the detenu’s case within the meaning of section 2(c) of the Act. A knowledgeable attorney for the petitioner further argued that any illegal activity that is likely to be committed or is alleged to have been committed cannot be connected to or have anything to do with maintaining public order; at most, it can be considered a violation of law and order.

In addition, other than witness statements and the filing of the aforementioned FIRs, there is no other pertinent or convincing evidence linking the alleged anti-social behaviour of the detainee to a breach of public order. The eminent advocate further argued that it was impossible to conclude from the facts of the case that the detainees’ involvement in criminal cases had disrupted and damaged society’s social fabric, eventually posing a threat to detainees’ ability to lead normal, everyday lives and had thrown the entire social system into disarray.

By disrupting public order, it is difficult for the entire system to function as one that is governed by the rule of law.

 COURT ANALYSIS AND DECISION

The learned AGP for the respondent-State supported the detention order issued by the authority and argued that enough information and evidence discovered during the course of the investigation and provided to the detainee indicate that the detainee is habitually engaging in the activity as defined under Section 2(c) of the Act. Taking these facts into account, the learned AGP for the respondent-State argued that the detention order issued by the authority and detention order

Primarily, it is determined that the subjective satisfaction reached by the detaining authority cannot be said to be legal, valid, and in accordance with law, inasmuch as the offences alleged in the FIR/s cannot have any bearing on the public order as required under the Act and other relevant penal laws re sufficient enough to take care of. After hearing the learned advocates for the parties and considering the documents and material available on record of the case.

It seems that the state authorities frequently disregard the aforementioned settled principle of law and issue orders without understanding that human freedom is unalienable and cannot be limited or curtailed unless the detention is absolutely necessary and the detainee’s behaviour interferes with “public order.” This Court has also observed that the state authorities are completely unaware of the distinction between “law and order” and “public order.”

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by-  Steffi Desousa

Click here to view judgement

0

If the dying declaration is truthful, voluntary and free from suspicion, it CAN be the basis for conviction: Bombay High Court

Title: Bhagwan Ramdas Tupe v. The State of Maharashtra

Decided on: 28th JULY, 2023

+ CRL.A. 530 OF 2016

CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

Facts of the Case

Bhagwan Ramdas Tupe (BRT) was previously convicted for Murder of one Vithabai, his neighbour and was thereof sentenced to life imprisonment.  BRT appealed to the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay HC and sought acquittal on the basis that there were inconsistencies between the dying declarations of 2 witnesses.

The respondents sought for the dismissal of the appeal for there was no “inconsistency” at all.  According to them the minor details may have been inconsistent, but overall, the story in both the dying declarations and Prime Witnesses is the same.

It was alleged that BRT had poured kerosene and tembha, i.e., burning wood, on Vithabai, due to which she sustained major burn injuries. She had not died instantly, she succumbed to the injuries only 2 months after the incident and before her death she gave her dying declaration to the Inspector.

Issues

Should the Dying Declaration of Vithabai be considered the basis for conviction?

Decision

The Court decided on the dying declaration made by Vithabai that although she had injuries, she was mentally sound and able to speak. In fact, her dying declaration corroborated with the Prime Witnesses’ story and therefore, the dying declaration made by her was truthful, voluntary and free from any suspicion.

Thus, the Court upheld the conviction and dismissed the appeal.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by – Aparna Gupta, University Law College & Dept. of Studies in Law

0

Regulation of Domestic Aviation in India

ABSTRACT

The article discusses the necessity of domestic airline regulation and the guidelines that must be followed in due accordance of aviation law. Because of the expansion of interpersonal ties as we move from the seas to the air and beyond our atmosphere, and additionally, because of globalization, aviation law is both necessary and justified.  The basic definition of aviation law i.e., The operation and regulation of airplanes and airports are governed by aviation law, a complex and dynamic field. It covers a wide range of topics, such as air traffic control, pilot training and certification, liability for accidents and incidents, and aircraft design and maintenance. Since India holds a prominent position in the civil aviation industry and aviation is a means of mass transportation in the modern era, air law is therefore crucial in determining social and economic life as well as public order in India and throughout the world.

 Research question –      How does India regulate civil aviation?

INTRODUCTION-

The history as defined as well as the given laws for the regulation a few as stated. The planning and execution of programs for the growth and expansion of civil air transport, airport facilities, air traffic services, and the carriage of passengers and goods by air are under the control of the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MCA), which is the nodal Ministry responsible for the formulation of policy and regulation of civil aviation in India. The primary regulatory bodies operating under the MCA’s authority are as follows:

  1. DGCA
  2. AAI
  3. BCAS
  4. Metrology
  5. Airlines

AUTHORITIES REGULATING THE DOMESTIC AIRLINES

  1. DGCA – The Directorate General of Civil Aviation

The DGCA derives its authority from the Aircraft Act and Rules and carries out tasks like issuing licences, approvals, certificates, and permits. It also enforces civil air regulations, regulates air transport services, air safety, and airworthiness standards.

All-encompassing control over India’s civil aviation, the ability to issue directions, the ability to issue CARs, the ability to make specifications, the ability to issue licences for people, aircraft, and aerodromes, the ability to approve schedules, and the ability to investigate accidents and incidents

  1. AAI

  The Ministry of Civil Aviation has delegated the responsibility for developing,      modernising, maintaining, and managing India’s civil aviation infrastructure to the Airports Authority of India, or AAI, a statutory body established under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. AAI also manages a total of 126 airports, including 11 international airports, 11 customs airports, 89 domestic airports, and 26 civil enclaves at military airfields. It offers Communication Navigation Surveillance / Air Traffic Management (CNS/ATM) services over Indian airspace and adjacent oceanic areas. AAI also has ground installations at all airports and 25 other locations to ensure the safety of aircraft operations.

The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is in charge of looking into and determining liability in the event of an accident or incident. In India, the AAIB looks into and publishes reports on incidents and accidents involving civil aircraft.The Air Transport Agreement Act, 2020, which the Indian government also passed, regulates and develops air transport services in India while fostering aviation industry economic development and safety and security.Overall, India’s aviation law is comprehensive and covers all facets of the aviation sector, including liability, safety and security, and consumer protection. Since it is a field that is constantly changing, updates and modifications are needed frequently to keep up with emerging technologies and market trends.

Various laws  force in India.

The safe and effective operation of aeroplanes and airports is ensured in India by a number of laws and regulations that govern aviation law. Key aviation laws that are applicable in India include:

The 1934 Aircraft Act:

The fundamental framework for India’s civil aviation regulation is outlined in this act. It addresses topics like the licencing of pilots, the registration of aircraft, and the control and navigation of airspace. To promote peaceful international cooperation through aerial navigation, the main objective was to harmonise international aviation regulations and ensure that all laws were applied equally.

 The Air Corporations Act of 1953:

This law sets up and governs public sector enterprises in the area of civil aviation.The Air Corporations Act of 1953 established Air Corporations and nationalised all air transportation in order to make better provisions for the country’s air transportation operations and to make it easier to acquire existing airline companies

 The carriage by air act, 1972

application of amended Convention to India.—(1) The rules contained in the Second Schedule, being the provisions of the amended Convention relating to the rights and liabilities of carriers, passengers, consignors, consignees and other persons, shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, have the force of law in India in relation to any carriage by air to which those rules apply, irrespective of the nationality of the aircraft performing the carriage[1].

The Airports Authority of India Act, 1994:

This law designates the Airports Authority of India (AAI) as the regulatory body responsible for overseeing the development and management of airports in India.

The Directorate General of Civil Aviation Act, 2011, designates the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) as the regulatory body responsible for monitoring and governing civil aviation in India.

The Authority will be responsible for effectively managing the airports, civil enclaves, and aeronautical communication stations on behalf of the government. The Authority is responsible for providing air traffic control and air transportation services at all airports and civil enclaves.

Scope for Civil aviation growth

Indian domestic airlines are experiencing a new era of growth, which is being fueled by factors like low cost carriers, modern airports, foreign direct investments, cutting edge information technology applications, and a growing focus on regional connectivity.

With a market size of roughly US$ 16 billion, India is the ninth-largest aviation market in the world and is expected to overtake China by 2022.

Due to its large and expanding middle class population, rapid economic growth, higher disposable incomes, rising middle class aspirations, and overall low penetration levels, India’s aviation industry has enormous growth potential. It also has the potential to become a major global MRO hub due to its expanding aircraft fleet, strategic location advantage, rich engineering talent pool, and lower labour costs.

Relevant cases

International Airport A.I. Officers Association v Union of India and Another, 2005 [iv]
The Court stated: “The rule of construction is well known that when there are two provisions in an enactment that cannot be reconciled with one other, they should be read in such a way that, if feasible, effect is given to both.” This is known as the harmonic construction rule

NipaDhar (nee Ghosh) v National Aviation Company of India Limited and others,

Considering the aforesaid principles of law and points discussed and my findings and observation above, writ is maintainable and I hold that there is breach of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The order of termination accordingly is not legally sustainable and it is set aside and quashed. Impugned judgement and order of Learned Trial Judge, except the order of consideration for alternative job, stand set aside and quashed Order of termination now has been quashed and set aside by us. As a resultant effect she will be deemed in service continuously[2].

Recent Changes

To support the civil aviation industry, the Government of India recently made a number of changes to the civil aviation policy and other relevant regulatory framework.

The changes include an effort to loosen up regulatory requirements, tax breaks for those industries, increased regional air connectivity, cost-cutting measures for operating and building new airports, obtaining a “make in India” policy to expand the reach and market size of this industry, and numerous other actions. The Government has finally taken action to fully revive the civil aviation sector, and in particular, the MRO sector, to stop the outflow of revenue due to the ever-growing fleet size, rising popularity of air travel among Indians, expansion, growth, and modernization of regional and international airports.

The Indian MRO industry is finally prepared to expand and take advantage of the vast untapped market opportunities due to the recent surge in regulatory requirements and potential tax benefits, as well as the government’s goal to make air travel more affordable for the country’s sizable middle class.

The MRO sector in India is anticipated to grow significantly between now and 2022, ranking among the strongest MRO markets worldwide and serving the requirements of both domestic and foreign airlines operating in and near India.

Conclusion

There have been a number of flight mishaps that call into question the safety of Indian air travel. All safety-related issues are primarily the DGCA’s concern. Since there aren’t enough training facilities and the DGCA lacks experience, it has frequently come under fire.Even though India’s aviation industry has been subject to a number of rules and regulations, there are still a number of issues that require immediate attention. Despite all of these challenges, the Indian aviation sector is one of the most thriving in the world. However, the Indian government must make a concerted effort to implement various international conventions.

In summary, aviation law is a complicated and dynamic field that is essential to maintaining the effectiveness and safety of the global aviation industry. It covers a broad range of legal concerns, such as safety, liability, environmental issues, and international treaties and agreements, that are connected to the operation and regulation of the aviation industry.The laws and rules governing the aviation industry are enforced and governed by national and international governmental organisations as well as international treaties and agreements. The scope of aviation law will keep growing with the expansion of the aviation industry, making it a crucial area of law in the years to come.

 

 

[1] https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1658/2/A1972-69.pdf

[2] https://www.aicb.org.in/images/advocacy/highCourtCases/Smt.%20Nipa%20Dhar%20(Nee%20Ghosh)%20vs%20National%20Aviation%20Company.PDF

1 33 34 35 36 37