0

Justice Prevails as Court Compensates Widow for Delayed Pension and Denounces Official Negligence: High Court of Patna

Title:  Jaymanti Devi vs. The State of Bihar & ORS.

Citation: Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No:6338 of 2023

Coram: HONA’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH

Decided on: 04-10-23

Introduction:

It mentions the individuals who are involved or present in the case: Mr. Om Prakash Maharaj, who is identified as the learned counsel representing the petitioner. Mr. Manish Kumar, identified as “GP 4,” along with Mr. Manoj Kumar (referred to as “AC to GP 4”). Mrs. Ritika Rani, who is noted as the learned counsel for the Accountant General (Bihar). It is a civil Writ Petition.

Facts:

 The facts of the case are such that, The learned counsel representing respondent numbers 2 and 9 has filed a second supplementary statement of facts on their behalf in the court. The petitioner, represented by another counsel, has informed the court that there has been a delay of 15 years in the payment of retiral dues, including family pension. The petitioner’s husband passed away in 2008 while he was serving as a Chawkidar.

The petitioner’s counsel argues that pension is not a privilege but a fundamental right under Article 300A of the Constitution of India. They claim that the petitioner is entitled to compensation and interest, as per legal precedents, for the delay in receiving pension and other retiral dues, starting from the date of entitlement to the date of payment.

Court Analysis & Judgement:

The petitioner, who is already receiving a family pension and has had some retiral dues paid, has faced a significant delay in the process, and this has caused considerable hardship to her as a widow and an illiterate individual. The court has expressed strong disapproval of the callous attitude of State Government officials, particularly the Block Development Officer, Circle Officer, and District Magistrate, in handling the petitioner’s case. In response to this, the District Magistrate has been directed by the court to compensate the petitioner with a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 (five lac) in addition to the interest, based on legal precedents provided in the cases of State of Kerala Vs. M. Padmanabhan Nair (1985) 1 SCC 429 and D.D. Tewari Vs. Uttar Haryana Bijli (2014) 8 SCC 894.

The court has given a timeframe for the authority concerned to carry out this compensation, which is within four weeks from the date of passing the order. With these observations and directions, the writ petition in this case has been disposed of. This implies that the court has concluded its proceedings in this matter based on the provided judgment.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written By: Gauri Joshi

Click here to view judgement

0

NALSAR Implemented The Menstrual Leave Policy: A Legal Outlook

Abstract

This article covers an in-depth legal overview of NALSAR University of Law’s recent menstrual leave policy implementation. Menstrual leave is a policy concept that has attracted attention as a crucial step towards gender equality. It was created to solve workplace issues relating to gender. The article addresses the growing trend of menstrual leave policies in both corporate and educational sectors, as well as the legal environment in India surrounding such policies and their consequences for workplace rights and gender discrimination. In addition, it explores the possible difficulties and disputes surrounding the use of menstrual leave rules, providing guidance on how to guarantee both legal observance and efficient implementation. This article adds to the current conversation on workplace rights and gender equality by offering a legal analysis of NALSAR’s menstrual leave policy.

Legal Basis Of The Law

In India, there is no specific law mandating menstrual leave. However, the policy can be framed under broader labour laws, such as the Factories Act, which provides for women’s health and safety at the workplace. The policy aligns with the principles of gender equality enshrined in the Constitution of India. It attempts to address the unique needs of women, recognizing the physical and emotional challenges many face during menstruation. The legal basis for this policy can be found in various dimensions of Indian law. To begin, Indian labour laws play a pivotal role. It is crucial to scrutinize labour statutes like the Factories Act, of 1948, and the Employees’ State Insurance Act, of 1948, which govern working conditions and employee benefits. By doing so, one can ascertain how NALSAR’s menstrual leave aligns with existing labour regulations and whether it conforms to legal standards.

Furthermore, the constitutional framework of India provides another significant legal backdrop. Articles 15(3) and 42 of the Constitution hold relevance here. Article 15(3) empowers the state to make special provisions for women, and Article 42 directs the state to ensure just and humane conditions of work. The alignment of NALSAR’s policy with these constitutional provisions is a pivotal aspect to consider from a legal standpoint. Gender equality laws in India, such as the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013, and the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, offer additional legal perspectives. These laws emphasize gender equality and rights in the workplace, and assessing how menstrual leave fits into this legal framework is essential.[1] Legal precedent, including relevant case law, also plays a crucial role. By referring to legal cases and precedents, one can ascertain whether there are established legal foundations for the implementation of policies like menstrual leave. Additionally, the policy must be examined within the context of human rights, as it pertains to women’s rights and dignity. Assessing its alignment with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is pertinent. Moreover, as NALSAR is an educational institution, its legal authority to implement such a policy must be evaluated. This entails considering the extent to which the institution may be subject to or exempt from specific labour laws.

 

Purpose of The Policy & MPLG (Menstrual leave policy group)

The Menstrual Leave Policy Group (MLPG) at NALSAR University of Law has recognized a prevalent issue affecting nearly 50% of the campus population, including students, professors, and workers. Menstrual cramps, dysmenorrhea, and associated symptoms like constipation and diarrhoea often go unaddressed, causing considerable discomfort. Many individuals also grapple with menstrual disorders like Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) or Polycystic Ovarian Disease (PCOD).[2] Despite the high prevalence of these issues, there exists a significant cultural taboo in India, even within educational spaces, where menstruating individuals are expected to endure their pain without accommodation or support.

NALSAR, known for its progressive initiatives like gender-neutral facilities and accessibility infrastructure, recognizes the need for change. The formation of the MLPG serves a dual purpose: to create a menstrual leave policy tailored to NALSAR’s context and to foster awareness and education about menstruation. The group aims to establish period-friendly spaces within the university, ensure access to targeted medical facilities, and provide sanitary napkin dispensers for faculty, students, and staff. The policy, modelled after medical leave systems, seeks to support menstruating individuals in taking care of their reproductive health without jeopardizing their access to education. This initiative represents another step forward in NALSAR’s commitment to inclusivity and equitable treatment for all members of its community.

Procedure To Claim Menstrual Leave At NALSAR

The Menstrual Leave provided to all the beneficiaries can hereby be claimed directly through the exam office. The certain manner is as follows:

A revised menstrual leave form will be made available to all students, and a duplicate copy will be maintained in the examination office, alongside the existing medical leave documentation.

Beneficiaries of the menstrual leave policy will have the option to personally submit the leave request, specifying the particular day for which they are seeking leave.

To avail of the menstrual leave, individuals must complete and physically submit the menstrual leave form to the examination office within a maximum of 7 working days from the date they wish to take the leave.

Constitutionality of Menstrual Leave Policies in India

Gender Equality and the Constitution: This section discusses the constitutional provisions that emphasize gender equality in India. It highlights Article 15(3), which empowers the state to make special provisions for women, and Article 42, which directs the state to ensure just and humane conditions of work. The examination of menstrual leave policies through the lens of these constitutional provisions is a pivotal aspect of this analysis.[3]

Right to Equality: The right to equality, as guaranteed by Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, is central to this discussion. It involves assessing whether menstrual leave policies treat individuals equally or disproportionately impact a specific gender. Analyzing potential legal challenges that may arise due to perceived discrimination is essential.

Fundamental Rights and Reproductive Health: This part explores how menstrual leave policies intersect with the fundamental rights of individuals. Specifically, it considers how these policies may align with the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21), the right to education (Article 21A), and the right to work (Article 41), while also addressing concerns related to menstrual disorders like PCOS and PCOD.

Objective of The Menstrual Leave Committee at NALSAR

The Menstrual Leave Committee has been established at NALSAR University of Law with a set of clear objectives aimed at addressing various aspects of menstrual health and hygiene. These objectives encompass ensuring the effective implementation of the Menstrual Leave Policy and creating a supportive environment for menstruating individuals within the university.

Conflict Resolution and Policy Enhancement: One of the key objectives of the Menstrual Leave Committee is to address conflicts related to the policy’s implementation. This includes concerns about attendance, the proper completion and submission of menstrual leave forms, and the identification of eligible beneficiaries. The committee is also tasked with preventing misuse of the policy. Furthermore, it seeks to make recommendations for potential amendments to university rules and policies that can better accommodate the needs of menstruating individuals.

Sensitization and Education: The committee is responsible for conducting sensitization programs on menstrual health and hygiene. These programs are designed to benefit a wide spectrum of the university community, including students, administration, faculty, staff, and other stakeholders. By raising awareness and providing education, the committee aims to dispel myths and stigmas surrounding menstruation.

Reproductive Health Promotion: Promoting reproductive health and hygiene is a core objective. The committee is tasked with organizing activities that support menstruating individuals in maintaining their reproductive health. This includes ensuring the availability of essential medical supplies, such as sanitary pads, antispasmodic medicines for period cramp relief, pain relief gels, and hot water bags at the University Health Centre[4]. These supplies are intended to benefit students, faculty, staff, and workers on campus.

Facility Improvement: To enhance the convenience and accessibility of menstrual hygiene products, the committee aims to install functional pad dispensers and incinerators in various campus facilities, including the Academic Block, Administrative Block, Girls Hostels, Library, and the Gender Neutral Washroom. These improvements seek to make menstrual hygiene products readily available to those in need.

Holistic Wellness: A holistic approach to wellness for menstruating individuals is promoted by the committee. This encompasses not only addressing physical health but also considering emotional and psychological well-being.

Policy Implementation and Beyond: In addition to the specific objectives outlined, the committee is responsible for all other activities required for the proper implementation of the Menstrual Leave Policy. This includes responding to emerging needs and evolving best practices to ensure that the policy remains effective and relevant.

 

Conclusion

In conclusion, NALSAR’s implementation of a Menstrual Leave Policy, when viewed through a legal lens, represents a significant stride towards promoting gender equality and recognizing the fundamental rights of menstruating individuals in the educational space. This legal analysis underscores the policy’s alignment with constitutional provisions emphasizing gender equality, fundamental rights, and the right to equality. It is a testament to NALSAR’s commitment to creating an inclusive and equitable educational environment.

The constitutional examination also underscores the importance of considering the right to equality under Article 14 and how menstrual leave policies must be crafted to ensure that they do not inadvertently discriminate or disproportionately affect a particular gender. The policy serves as a platform for addressing both gender disparities and the broader issue of reproductive health and hygiene.

As the Menstrual Leave Policy becomes a part of NALSAR’s institutional framework, it signifies a progressive step forward, fostering awareness and education on menstruation, challenging taboos, and addressing the practical needs of menstruating individuals. This legal outlook underscores the policy’s potential to serve as a model for other educational institutions in India, sparking dialogue and change regarding the treatment of reproductive health in the academic sphere.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written By: Gauri Joshi

[1] Menstrual leave Policy of 2023

[2] NALSAR rule book for menstrual leave

[3] SCC ONLINE

 

0

System Default is the standard excuse given by the Department when it comes to giving refunds

 High Court of Bombay Observed System Default is the standard excuse given by the Department when it comes to giving refunds.

Title : Matrix Publicities and Media India Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle16(1), Mumbai & Ors

Decided on : 25th October 2023

Case No. : W.P (L) No.16764/2023

CORAM : HON’BLE Mr K. R. SHRIRAM, HON’BLE Ms NEELA GOKHALE

Introduction

The bench of Justice K. R. Shriram and Justice Neela Gokhale has observed that the excuse used is that the system under the control of the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC), Bangalore, has some issues and, therefore, amounts are not being released to assesses. Interest is payable by law until the date of refund, and the Department does not realize that it is public money that is used to pay interest. That is a waste and a burden on the exchequer.

Facts of the Case

The Petition is restricted to seeking refund amount of Rs.19,69,46,789/- for Assessment Year 2020-21. But it appears amount payable is Rs.19,79,40,376/- and Mr. Singh has nothing to dispute this amount. Mr. Singh relies on affidavit of reply of one Mr. Parmanand Pravin Darade, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax16(1), Mumbai affirmed on 20th October 2023.

“A copy of this order be sent to the PMO, the Hon’ble Finance Minister GOI, the Hon’ble Law Minister GOI, the Central Board of Direct Taxes and to the Attorney General for India for information and necessary action”.

Case Analysis and Decision

The department sorted out its technical issues, totally unrelated to any substantial legal issue, nevertheless contravening the fundamental right of Petitioner to receive undisputed amount of refund, the present proceedings would not have crept into the litigation arena.

The Court ordered Respondents either by itself or through CC shall ensure that the amount is credited to Petitioner’s account on or before 4th November 2023 with interest up to the date of payment in accordance with law.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by- Nimisha Sunny

0

Bata questioned the status of such salesman as ‘workman’ under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently as ‘employee’ under the MRTU & PULP Act.

High Court of Bombay on Bata’s  status of such salesman as ‘workman’ under the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 and consequently as ‘employee’ under the MRTU & PULP Act.

Title : M/s. Bata India Ltd v. Mr. Yellappa Satyappa Patil

Decided on :01 November,2023

Case No. : W.P. No. 1815/2016

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. SANDEEP V. MARNE

Introduction

Labour Court has however held those salesmen as workmen under the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act and ‘employees’ under MRTU & PULP Act and held the complaints to be maintainable. In two sets of complaints, Bata is before this Court challenging findings on preliminary point of status of salesman as workman.

Facts of the Case

Accordingly, by Notification dated 02 February 2007, the State Government granted permission to Bata to keep its retail outlets open for 07 days in a week and during extended working hours subject to various conditions.

Bata accordingly issued notices to the employees employed in the showrooms in November 2007 giving them intimation about the permission granted by the State Government. Bata prepared a duty chart with a view to man its showrooms during the extended hours for keeping them open for 07 days in a week. It appears that some of the salesmen in the showrooms were not willing to accept the sudden change in the working hours.

Courts analysis and decision

Bata unsuccessfully challenged Labour Court’s decision in revision before the Industrial Court and upon dismissal of its revisions, has filed Writ Petition . In rest of the cases, the Labour Court not only held the Complainants to be workmen but proceeded to set aside the termination orders by directing reinstatement with 50% back wages.

Appellant Court could not find any error in the orders passed by Labour Court holding the termination of employees to be illegal. The Industrial Court has rightly rejected the Revisions filed by the Bata challenging the relief of reinstatement granted by the Labour Court.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by- Nimisha Sunny

0

No Other Consent Required If The Statutory Right To Reconstruction Is Established: High Of Bombay

Title: Chandralok People Welfare Association v. State of Maharashtra

Coram : Gs Patel & Kamal Khata, Jj

Dated : 18th October 2023

Introduction:

The Petitioner is a Welfare Association. It says or claims to have as its membership, seven persons who are in its Managing Committee and fully 103 persons who are or were monthly tenants of the Chandralok building at Sudhakar Dubey Compound. The Association is registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

Facts:

The building was constructed in 1965. It outlived its life. It does not seem to have been subjected even to normal or routine repairs and certainly not to more intensive repairs as the passage of time may have required. By 2014, the building had deteriorated considerably. Then came to pass the usual process of obtaining structural audit reports of the construction. Ultimately these resulted in the second Respondent, the MCGM represented by Mr Waghmare categorizing the building in the C-1 category. This meant that it was dilapidated, dangerous, uninhabitable and required to be pulled down.

The building received notices inter alia under Section 353-B on 10th April 2019 and then a notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (“MMC Act”) on 24th June 2019 is not in dispute. The building was vacated on 16th July 2019 and was demolished. Respondent claims that this demolition is in violation of orders of the City Civil Court, particularly an order dated 11th July 2019.

Since July 2019 all 103 tenants are off-site, scattered across the city, their once tightly-knit community fractured. Since then, and this is the number of the complaint, they have seen no vestige or semblance of any proposal for reconstruction or redevelopment.

Court’s Judgement and Analysis:

The court on the basis of circumstances and because of finding no answer at all to either the Petition or even to queries of this Court in the Affidavit of Respondent, made the Rule partly absolute in terms of prayer clause (b) permitting the Petitioner Association to apply to the MCGM for permission for reconstruction of the demolished building. And regarding the question of transit accommodation or transit rent, court did not find a specific provision to that effect in the MMC Act. So the petitioner were directed towards Maharashtra Rent Control Act ,1999 to find a remedy.

Furthermore it was decided that subject to any orders in Rent Act proceedings, all tenants will continue as tenants in the reconstructed building. The mere pendency of a rent proceeding will not disentitle any tenant to possession of reconstructed premises. The association must make its own arrangements for financing the reconstruction. court have only affirmed their statutory right to reconstruction and the MCGM’s obligation to permit it without requiring the prior consent of Respondents.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by- Sushant Kumar Sharma

Click here to view judgement

1 32 33 34 35 36 38