0

 IF THE PETITIONER HAD FILED A WRIT PETITION ONLY ON APPREHENSION, THE PETITION IS MISCONCEIVED : TELANGANA HIGH COURT

 

The High Court of Telangana passed a judgment on 10 March, 2023stating that  If the petitioner had filed a writ petition only on apprehension, the petition is misconceived. It was stated in the case of P.Anjaiah vs The State Of  Telangana And 5 Others ( WRIT PETITION No.6578 of 2023) which was passed by the single judge bench comprising of HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

 

FACTS OF THE CASE:

This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.2 in issuing notice No.D1/74/2023, dated 21-01-2023 to the petitioner during the pendency of civil suit vide O.S.No.48 of 2019, as illegal.

JUDGEMENT OF THE CASE

The  Court directed the Special Tribunal to put petitioner and respondent Nos.5 and 6 herein on notice and afford them an opportunity of hearing and pass orders afresh. Thus, there is a clear direction to the Special Tribunal to put the petitioner herein on notice and afford him an opportunity of hearing. Even then, the petitioner herein had filed the present writ petition only on apprehension. Therefore, this writ petition is misconceived and liable to be dismissed.

 

PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

JUDGEMENT REVIEWED BY ROSHNI SABU, KERALA LAW ACADEMY LAW COLLEGE.

Click here to view judgement 1.16

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *