Blog

The matter was between State of Karnataka vs Dyamanna S/O Brahmanand Badiger on 16 November, 2022 and was presided by Hon’ble Justice R Nataraj (MFA No. 103159 of 2015) This appeal is filed by the state government challenging the judgment and award dated 10/29/2014 issued by III. by Another Senior Civil Judge, Hubballi in LAC No. 8/2011. When this appeal is included in the final hearing,

Facts of the case

An appeal was presented by the state of karnataka represented by its secretary, dept. of revenue m.s. building, bengaluru-1.and the assistant commissioner and land acquisition officer, dharwad sub-division, dharwad.against dyamanna s/o brahmanand badiger, age:59 years, occ:agriculture r/o: kusugal, tq: hubballi, dist: dharwad   the deputy chief engineer, construction south-WESTERN, RAILWAY, hubballi.

This MFA is submitted according to § 54 paragraph 1 plot charging act, 1894, prayed to stay judgment and the award was given by the iii additional senior civil

JUDGEMENT

The Judge MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ observed that it is stated that the appeal filed by the recipient in MFA No. 100848/2016 against the same resolution issued by the reference court was rejected. In view of the matter, there is no need to interfere with the contested judgment and finding issued by the referring court. The appeal is therefore without merit and is dismissed.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

JUDGMENT REVIEWED BY HARSHA L NALWAR

Click on this link to view the judgment