The Supreme Court held that all members of society, including those with disabilities, should be able to access court decisions through the learned bench consisting of HONOURABLE JUSTICES DY CHANDRACHUD AND AS BOPANNA in the case of State Bank of India vs Ajay Kumar Sood. The court further stated that digital signatures are required to sign the judgements.
FACTS OF THE CASE: Brief facts of the case are as follows; In the present case, when hearing an appeal against a decision of the Himachal Pradesh High Court that upheld an order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, the bench made this observation. After determining that the High Court’s contested ruling is unclear, the court provided sweeping rules for authoring judgements. The court also provided recommendations for enhancing the judgements’ accessibility and readability.
The following observations were made by the Supreme Court in the same case :
- All judicial institutions must take care to prevent incorrectly placed watermarks from appearing on the judgments and orders they publish since they render the documents inaccessible to people with visual impairments who use screen readers to access them.
- The version of the decisions and orders that have been uploaded must also be accessible and digitally signed, according to courts and tribunals. It shouldn’t be scanned copies of printed materials.
- Printing and scanning documents is a pointless, time-consuming procedure that accomplishes nothing. Since the practise tends to make documents and the legal system unavailable to a wide range of citizens, it should be eliminated from the litigation process.
JUDGEMENT: The bench disposed this appeal and stated that the judge must write a clear analysis of the legal and factual issues that need to be resolved. The Supreme Court also declared that the Judgments must carry paragraph numbers and a table of contents in a longer version so as to make it accessible accessible to persons from all sections of society including persons with disability.
PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into the category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, and best civil lawyer.
Judgement reviewed by – Abhinav Paul Mathew