0

Appalents examination not conducted as per procedure: Supreme court acquits accused

Title: NABABUDDIN @ MALLU @ ABHIMANYU V STATE OF HARYANA

Citation: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2333 OF 2010

Dated on: 24.11.2023

Corum:  HON’BLE JUSTICE Abhay S. Oka & JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL

Facts of the case

In the present case the appellant, Nababuddin alias Mallu alias Abhimanyu, was convicted, together with two co-accused, of possessing 205 kilograms of poppy straw without a licence or permit, a violation of Section 15 of the NDPS Act. The High Court upheld the conviction. The appellant claimed he was a rickshaw puller and had nothing to do with the illicit packages. He said that he went to the railway station to inquire about his co-accused Rahish, who had gone to inquire about the goods on behalf of the owner. He also stated that the railway receipt for the parcels was not in his name, and this fact was not brought to his attention during his examination under Section 313 of CrPC.

Legal provision

In the present case, the accused evidence was not taken as per sec 313 of CrPc which states that According to this section, the accused has the right to be questioned by the court after the prosecution has concluded its case, and to clarify any event included in the evidence against him or her. The part also establishes the norms and standards for conducting such an examination.

Court analysis and judgement

The Supreme Court granted the appeal and acquitted the appellant. The Court ruled that the appellant’s investigation under Section 313 of CrPC did not include the two substantial circumstances charged against him: that the railway receipt was in his name and that he inquired about the shipments. The Court recognized that this was a severe anomaly that jeopardized the appellant’s defence. The Court further noted that there was no other evidence linking the appellant to the offense.

“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”

Written by- Namitha Ramesh

click here to view judgement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *