Blog

The Petitioners were asserted to terribly hurt the source and his family members. The Petitioners were allowed bail aside from Petitioner 5 who was principally blamed for harming the most. The Hon’ble High Court of Patna before Justice Mr. Ahsanuddin Amanullah in the matter Kriya Ram and others v. The State of Bihar[Criminal Miscellaneous No. 35560 of 2020].

The facts of the case were that the solicitor was captured capture regarding the Case, founded under Sections 147, 149, 447, 448, 341, 323, 324, 325, and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. It was affirmed that the applicants had attacked the source and made genuine wounds the family members of the witness.

Learned insight for the applicants presented that the gatherings are agnates and there was a battle between them for which there is additionally a counter case. It was presented that even according to the claim, the equivalent are general and omnibus in nature besides against applicant no. 5, who is said to have attacked, alongside others, not solicitors in this, with an iron bar on the head of Rajendra Ram. Learned guidance presented that the candidates have no other criminal precursor and surprisingly in the FIR, no explanation has been referenced regarding the reason why the event occurred.

The Additional Public Prosecutor fought that there were 2 heinous injury reports. Be that as it may, it wasn’t contested a lot. However, it was explicit that solicitor 5 alongside some co-charged attacked by the iron pole on the head and claims are general and omnibus.

The Hon’ble High Court Of Patna held,” Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, petitioner no. 1, namely, Kriya Ram @ Bablu Ram @ Bablu Kumar; petitioner no. 2, namely, Sudhir Ram; petitioner no. 3, namely, Kamlesh Ram; petitioner no. 4, namely, Jugesh Ram and petitioner no. 6, namely, Pappu Ram, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount…” The Petition of Petitioner 5 stood rejected by the Court. The Petitioner stood disposed of on the mentioned terms.

Click Here To Read The Judgment

Judgment Review By Nimisha Dublish