0

To fulfil “personal life’s exigencies” the M.V. Tribunals may permit the Claimant to withdraw FD Compensation prematurely: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court on 2nd August 2022 ruled that Motor Accident Claims Tribunals may allow claimants whose compensation is invested in fixed deposits to withdraw the funds prematurely to fulfil the “exigencies of life”, through the single bench of Justice Gita Gopi in the case of Bipinchandra Babulal Thakker vs Govindbhai M. Prajapati (Special Civil Application No. 13772 of 2022).

 

FACTS OF THE CASE:

According to the facts of the case, the petitioner is a 62-year-old claimant who had filed a petition and challenged the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux) order of 27.6.2022 in MACMA no.202 of 2022 in connection with MACP no.460 of 2010. The application was for the premature withdrawal of FDR deposited in the Central Bank of India, Mithakhali Branch, Ahmedabad, by the orders issued in the judgement and award rendered on 08.08.2018, in MACP no.460 of 2010. Petitioner’s application was rejected and the Tribunal failed to recognise the reason for premature withdrawal as having obtained P.R. of USA and planning to go to America. The petitioner’s daughter is in America, and due to his age, he proposes to stay with her, especially since he has received P.R. of USA.

After a motor accident, while working as a wholesale bookseller, the Petitioner was granted Rs. 6.5 lacs in compensation. 30% of the funds were provided to him in the form of a cheque, with the balance maintained in an FD.

The Petitioner contended that, as a senior citizen, he needed the money for medical expenses. The Petitioner drew the Bench’s attention to A.V. Padma & Ors. vs. R. Venugopal & Ors. [(2012) 3 SCC 378] to opine that the Tribunal was obligated to give thoughtful consideration to the Claimant’s requirements and should avoid a “mechanical approach” that overlooked the Act’s intent and spirit.

Further, the case of General Manager, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Trivandrum vs. Susamma Thomas & Ors. was relied upon where the Supreme Court established certain guidelines for claims:

  • In the event of minors, the Claims Tribunal should always keep a Fixed Deposit for compensation awarded until the date of majority is attained.
  • In the instance of illiterate Claimants, the Tribunal may award a lump sum payment if the claimant is obliged to make a living.
  • Semi-literate persons may be given the entire or a portion of the sum to grow their company or purchase property to earn a living.
  • The judgement decision further said that in all situations, Tribunals should allow Claimants to petition for withdrawal in the event of an emergency.

JUDGEMENT:

The Tribunal, according to Justice Gopi, neglected to consider that the 62-year-old Claimant was interested in settling down in the United States, and the amount invested in his name had become his requirement to maintain himself.

According to the Single Judge Bench, the intention of depositing the Claimant’s money in a Fixed Deposit Receipt was for the Claimant’s benefit to secure the safety of the amount. The High Court stated that if the amount is not provided to the Petitioner, it will be useless to him since he will not be staying in India.

Accordingly, the petition was allowed.

PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into the category of Best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, and best civil lawyer.

 

JUDGEMENT REVIEWED BY NIDHI KUMAR

 

 

Read the full judgement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Open chat