0

The amount in PPF account shall not be liable to be attached in any debt: Gujarat High Court

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Gujarat through the learned bench led by HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA in the case of Rajnikant Punjalal Shah v. Manager (R/Special Civil Application No. 10377 of 2020).

Facts:

The instant writ petition directing Bank to deposit PPF amount deducted for settlement of liability. Petitioner was holding a Public Provident Fund (PPF) Account under the Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968 with the respondent- Bank in the name of Rajnikant Punjalal Shah Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). The petitioner is a partner at Gujarat Steel & Pipes— Partnership Firm and the said firm was also holding a Cash Credit Account with the respondent-Bank.

 

Arguments and Judgement:

Advocate appearing for the petitioner submitted that the Government of India vide notification dated 12-12-2019 beingPublic Provident Fund Scheme, 2019 under Section 9 of the Public Provident Fund Act, 1968 has clarified that the amount standing in the PPF Account shall not be liable to any attachment in respect of any debt or liability incurred by the account holder hence, the PPF account is protected against any kind of recovery, debt etc. It was further submitted that the respondent Bank has illegally and without the consent of the petitioner debited the amount of Rs.85,380/- from his PPF Account to Cash Credit Account of his partnership firm which is illegal and de hors the procedure prescribed in law.

Advocate appearing for the respondent Bank submitted that the action of the respondent was justified and hence, no orders may be passed.

The Court noted that the respondent Bank had withdrawn/debited the aforesaid amount of Rs.85,380/- from the PPF Account of the petitioner and stated that it is well settled proposition of law that the amount of Public Provident Fund account shall not be liable to any attachment in respect of any debt or liability incurred by the account holder. Thus, it was held that the action of the respondent Bank of withdrawing/debiting the aforesaid amount from the PPF Account of the petitioner was illegal and unjustified.

The petition was allowed, and respondent Bank was directed to deposit the amount of Rs.85,380/- within a period of four weeks in the Savings Bank Account in the name of Rajnikant Punjalal Shah HUF.

PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of Best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.

Judgement reviewed by – Arvind Roshan

Click here to view the Judgement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Open chat